not the logic for the object of memory, but always for our younger self's direct finger-tip touch & presentment
-a patronising matronising of the past. does not the past have its' rights
the inanimate presumably does not remember its avatars as the animate. perhaps the animate in its silence can remember what it means to be the pure flowerhood, flow-line of the river, a horizon's darkening, a galaxy's past
No comments:
Post a Comment